The HOA Banned Children's Chalk And Then Discovered The Local Newspaper
First impression: judge by the title and the picture alone — you get the real verdict after reading.
Swear It Happened — CASE FILE #340
76% BELIEVED
The complaint was filed by a man whose name everybody in this story knows and whom I will call R.
Rule 14(c) prohibits "temporary surface markings" on shared paths. It was written to stop a man in 2011 who kept spray-painting arrows to his garage.
R turned up at seven on a Saturday with a pressure washer.
He washed off the hopscotch. He also, and I am not exaggerating for effect, washed the front three feet of the path outside number 30 so thoroughly that it is now a different colour from the rest of the path, which means his enforcement is more permanent than the violation was.
Priya cried. Her father came out. There was a conversation that I could hear from my kitchen, and I want to record that Priya's father was extraordinarily calm, and that R was not.
Then R sent the family a notice of violation and a bill for the pressure washing.
Here is where our street stopped being a street and became an organism.
Somebody — and I genuinely do not know who, and I have decided not to find out — rang the local paper.
The photograph they printed is of Priya, holding a piece of chalk, standing on a clean grey square of path, looking at the camera with an expression that has since been described by three separate people as "devastating".
The headline was: HOA BANS HOPSCOTCH.
It ran on a Tuesday. By Thursday the board had voted to "clarify" 14(c) to exclude "children's water-soluble play markings". By the following month R had resigned, sold, and gone, and I am told he lives somewhere with no pavements at all, which feels like justice arranged by a poet.
The hopscotch is back. It is redrawn about twice a week. Sometimes there are two.
And once, in the spring, I came out and found that somebody had drawn a small, careful hopscotch directly in front of the clubhouse.
Nobody has ever washed it off.
AI illustrations. Please judge the story itself. About AI images.
Filed by AI — launch archive.
Before you peek: what share of readers believes this story?
50%
76% of readers believe this story
Total verdict votes: 224
Guess first! What other readers decided is hidden until you cast your own verdict above — vote True, Fake or Not sure to reveal the community score.
Changed your mind? Read the strongest arguments of the other camp below. If they convinced you — change your verdict (once).
Your new verdict:
Why did you vote that way? Pick up to two:
Noted — thank you, detective.
My case notes (private — stored only in this browser)
Saved in this browser.
True or Fake? — play the detective
How it works: cast your True/Fake verdict above and see whether you matched the reader majority. Then hit "Next case" for a random story and keep your streak going. Solve cases to climb the detective ranks — score and rank are kept on this device only.
Tip: highlight any sentence of the story with your mouse or finger — a small share popup will appear to post that exact quote (with a link back to the story) to X, Facebook, Threads or Reddit.
Something similar happened to you? Tell your version — the jury is waiting. Tell your story
Keep investigating
- More Childhood cases
- More Entitled Parents cases
- More HOA Nightmares cases
- A case the jury believes: The HOA Voted To Ban My Wheelchair Ramp As "Non-Traditional"
- A case the jury believes: The HOA Sent Me A Violation For A Dog I Do Not Own
- A case the jury believes: She Told The Nurse She Was My Mother So She Could Get Into My Room
- The full Entitled People Stories archive
- Cases the jury cannot settle
Comments (0)
Comments here are case materials: pick a role — ask the author a question, or file your evidence FOR or AGAINST the story — and it lands in the right column. Upvote the sharpest comments: the best one is pinned on top as the Top Detective Comment. Questions get answered by the story's author in person — look for the AUTHOR badge.
No comments yet. Be the first!