Three Aircraft Asked Us What The Fourth One Was
First impression: judge by the title and the picture alone — you get the real verdict after reading.
Swear It Happened — CASE FILE #305
61% BELIEVED
On the night in question there were three inbounds and nothing else. It was 02:40-ish. I was doing the inside of the west glass.
The first pilot asked, in that flattened, careful voice they use when they do not want to be the one who says it: "Are you painting anything at our two o'clock, same level?"
The controller said negative.
The second aircraft, a few minutes later, asked whether there was "activity" in the area. The controller said negative again, and then — and I watched him do this — he leaned forward and looked out of the window, which in nine years I had never once seen a controller do.
The third one did not ask a question. The third one said, "We're going to go around it, if that's all right with you," and the controller said, "Say again," and the pilot said, "We're going around."
Around what?
I looked out where they were all looking. There was a light. It was not blinking in the way that aircraft blink. It was steady, low, and it was the colour of a fridge bulb, and it did not move for maybe four minutes. And then it did move, and it moved in the way a fish moves when it decides to be somewhere else — not a curve, not a turn, just a change.
The controllers did not talk about it. That is what I keep coming back to. They filled in their bits and pieces and one of them said something like "well," and they carried on, and at handover nobody mentioned it.
I asked one of them, weeks later, when he was in a good mood. He said, "If I file that, I'm in an office with a doctor by Friday. And I have two kids."
So I am filing it instead. I am a cleaner. Nobody is going to take my licence.
Maybe it was a drone. It was 2019 and drones existed. But I have never seen a drone that three separate pilots agreed to go around.
AI illustrations. Please judge the story itself. About AI images.
Filed by AI — launch archive.
Before you peek: what share of readers believes this story?
50%
61% of readers believe this story
Total verdict votes: 201
Guess first! What other readers decided is hidden until you cast your own verdict above — vote True, Fake or Not sure to reveal the community score.
Changed your mind? Read the strongest arguments of the other camp below. If they convinced you — change your verdict (once).
Your new verdict:
Why did you vote that way? Pick up to two:
Noted — thank you, detective.
My case notes (private — stored only in this browser)
Saved in this browser.
True or Fake? — play the detective
How it works: cast your True/Fake verdict above and see whether you matched the reader majority. Then hit "Next case" for a random story and keep your streak going. Solve cases to climb the detective ranks — score and rank are kept on this device only.
Tip: highlight any sentence of the story with your mouse or finger — a small share popup will appear to post that exact quote (with a link back to the story) to X, Facebook, Threads or Reddit.
Something similar happened to you? Tell your version — the jury is waiting. Tell your story
Keep investigating
- More Late Night cases
- More UFO Sightings cases
- More Lights in the Sky cases
- A case the jury believes: The Combine Died, The Lights Came, And Then The Combine Started Again
- A case the jury believes: The Radar Operator Bought Me A Beer And Told Me To Forget It
- A case the jury believes: My Dog Watched It Move Across The Sky And Never Barked Once
- The full UFO Stories archive
- Cases the jury cannot settle
Comments (0)
Comments here are case materials: pick a role — ask the author a question, or file your evidence FOR or AGAINST the story — and it lands in the right column. Upvote the sharpest comments: the best one is pinned on top as the Top Detective Comment. Questions get answered by the story's author in person — look for the AUTHOR badge.
No comments yet. Be the first!